Authorised crypto firms in New York (United States)

Name: Issafu Crypto Register Index: New York (United States)
Creator: Issafu
Published: 2026-09-08
License: https://issafu.com/terms

Every firm the New York (United States) authority has published, counted by the services its register names.

Counts are of published entries on the retrieval date; they are not a statement about any firm today.

authorised firms: 39
firms available: 39

By service

authorised, largest first

By service


Virtual currency licence (BitLicense)	26	26
Money transmitter licence	15	15
Limited purpose trust charter	13	13

Services with fewer than 30 authorised firms in this jurisdiction are counted on this page but carry no page of their own; the register table above lists every firm either way.

Download the New York (United States) service-level dataset (CSV), free to reuse with citation.

Sources, citation and related pages

Cite or embed this figure

The authorised crypto-asset firms in New York (United States) was 39 in the registers as published on 8 September 2026, across 39 register entries recorded in the regulators.

Cite as: "Issafu Crypto Register Index: New York (United States)", updated 2026-09-08, https://issafu.com/register/new-york-united-states/.

Embed this figure (plain HTML, no scripts)

Authorised crypto-asset firms · New York (United States) · the registers as published on 8 September 2026

register entries	39

Source: Issafu Crypto Register Index: New York (United States)

<figure style="margin:0;max-width:340px;padding:16px 18px;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:10px;background:#ffffff;color:#0f172a;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;line-height:1.4;"><figcaption style="margin:0 0 6px;font-size:11px;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#64748b;background:#ffffff;">Authorised crypto-asset firms &middot; New York (United States) &middot; the registers as published on 8 September 2026</figcaption><p style="margin:0;font-size:26px;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;background:#ffffff;">39<span style="font-size:14px;font-weight:400;color:#64748b;"></span></p><table style="width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:10px 0 0;font-size:13px;background:#ffffff;border:0;"><tbody style="background:#ffffff;"><tr style="background:#ffffff;"><th scope="row" style="text-align:left;font-weight:400;color:#64748b;background:#ffffff;border:0;padding:3px 0;">register entries</th><td style="text-align:right;font-weight:600;color:#0f172a;background:#ffffff;border:0;padding:3px 0;">39</td></tr></tbody></table><p style="margin:12px 0 0;font-size:12px;color:#64748b;background:#ffffff;">Source: <a href="https://issafu.com/register/new-york-united-states/#stats" style="color:#2563eb;background:#ffffff;text-decoration:underline;">Issafu Crypto Register Index: New York (United States)</a></p></figure>

Source: ESMA interim MiCA register - crypto-asset service providers (CASPS.csv) (337), retrieved 2026-09-08; NYDFS virtual currency businesses - BitLicense and limited purpose trust charter holders (39), retrieved 2026-09-08; VARA public register - licensed Virtual Asset Service Providers (Dubai) (56), retrieved 2026-09-08; Bermuda Monetary Authority - Digital Assets Business Act licensees (52), retrieved 2026-09-08; FINMA authorised institutions - persons under Article 1b of the Banking Act (the Swiss FinTech licence) (7), retrieved 2026-09-08

Methodology: Counts are of register entries exactly as each regulator published them on the retrieval date shown beside that register's name. recordCount for a jurisdiction is the HOME-authorised set - the firms that jurisdiction's own authority authorised - and never the passported union: under MiCA nearly every firm passports everywhere, so the home set is what differs from page to page. availableCount adds firms passported in, where the register records passporting; the single-regime registers (New York, Dubai, Bermuda, Switzerland) record none, so for those jurisdictions the two counts are equal. A scope counts home-authorised firms notified for that service under that jurisdiction's own regime; a service phrase no register vocabulary names is refused at projection rather than dropped, so no authorisation is silently missing from a page. Nothing here is computed by us: every figure is a count of published rows.

EnquireFind an authorised firm