Cite or embed this figure The authorised crypto-asset firms in Belgium was 2 in the registers as published on 8 September 2026, across 2 register entries recorded in the regulators.
Cite as: "Issafu Crypto Register Index: Belgium", updated 2026-09-08, https://issafu.com/register/belgium/.
Embed this figure (plain HTML, no scripts) Copy embed Other jurisdictions in the index Source: ESMA interim MiCA register - crypto-asset service providers (CASPS.csv) (337), retrieved 2026-09-08; NYDFS virtual currency businesses - BitLicense and limited purpose trust charter holders (39), retrieved 2026-09-08; VARA public register - licensed Virtual Asset Service Providers (Dubai) (56), retrieved 2026-09-08; Bermuda Monetary Authority - Digital Assets Business Act licensees (52), retrieved 2026-09-08; FINMA authorised institutions - persons under Article 1b of the Banking Act (the Swiss FinTech licence) (7), retrieved 2026-09-08
Methodology: Counts are of register entries exactly as each regulator published them on the retrieval date shown beside that register's name. recordCount for a jurisdiction is the HOME-authorised set - the firms that jurisdiction's own authority authorised - and never the passported union: under MiCA nearly every firm passports everywhere, so the home set is what differs from page to page. availableCount adds firms passported in, where the register records passporting; the single-regime registers (New York, Dubai, Bermuda, Switzerland) record none, so for those jurisdictions the two counts are equal. A scope counts home-authorised firms notified for that service under that jurisdiction's own regime; a service phrase no register vocabulary names is refused at projection rather than dropped, so no authorisation is silently missing from a page. Nothing here is computed by us: every figure is a count of published rows.