Esthetician insurance: Cover Premium Index

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through the estate's fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

30 of the 53 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 22 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 3 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in USD (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 423 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

Derivation as chartered: the median, minimum and maximum PUBLISHED price per cover, per trade and per market across every insurer, MGA and scheme that publishes one at all - and, beside it, the share that publishes nothing: on the 52 pages read for this charter the beauty and wellness schemes publish an annual rate to the pound ($149, $179, $199, $259) while the UK motor-leisure specialists mostly quote only, so the finding nobody publishes is WHICH markets have a shelf price and which hide behind a quote form.

Then the spread within one cover (esthetician liability runs $96/yr to $259/yr across seven schemes), the gap between a scheme's flat rate and a broker's median for the same trade, the repriced-since the previous read, and the cheapest published price per trade per market.

423 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.